Depiction of Stradivari in his workshop |
Stradivari. Guarneri. Are these names familiar to you? They
probably aren’t unless you have a love of classical music or perhaps play a
stringed instrument. Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri were two of the
most famous Italian instrument makers of the 18th century. The sound
of their instruments has long been classified as rich and elegant, and many
have tried and failed to match the quality instruments that these artists have
made.
Until recently, the top quality sound from these instruments
has been believed to come from the type of wood used and the geometry in the
instrument itself. However, recent studies have provided evidence for
degradation in the wood due to microbes and other chemicals that changed the
acoustics of the instruments.
In a 2009 study by a group at Texas A&M University,
instruments made by Stradivari and Guarneri were compared to French and English
instruments from the same time period as well as natural wood controls. The
group had examined the same wood in 2006 and had come to the conclusion that
the polymers in the wood had undergone degradation that is possible only
through chemical means. They examined the wood using many methods of analysis,
including back-scattered electron imaging, x-ray fluorescence, wavelength
dispersive spectroscopy, x-ray spectroscopy, and quantitative microprobe
analysis. Their findings support the idea that Stradivari and Guarneri knowingly or unknowingly used
chemicals to treat the wood while making their instruments (budding chemists, maybe?). These compounds are
speculated to reduce hemicellulose enzymes, which also reduce the moisture and
the density of the wood. This turns out to be really important in a
good-sounding instrument.
All four of the Stradivari and Guarneri instruments that were analyzed did contain unusual compounds compared to all of
the other samples. The most noteworthy was the finding of sodium borate (borax),
a common insecticide and fungicide that was used back in the day and
still is today. Calcium fluoride and zirconium silicate (Zircon) were also found in some
of the samples. None these compounds occur naturally in wood, so they must have
been added by the makers themselves. Since the researchers took care to avoid varnish samples, these compounds were either unintended for the instruments or added deliberately. Cool thing is, the salts are known to cause atrophy of
the wood and also help in oxidation. This leads to stiffness of the wood, an
important factor in sound quality.
In the 1800s, boiling the wood of instruments was common practice. This removed both tension and
other soluble substances that clogged up the pores. The wood became stiffer
and dryer, which led to better sound and higher sound velocity.
However, this also had the potential to damage the instrument unless done
properly.
Being soaked in water also helped the sound of the wood
because the cell walls remain open, allowing the wood to retain some amount of
permeability. The wood used for the instruments was most likely floated
down-river, picking up microbes and bacteria along the way. These little organisms burrow into
the wood, adding to the permeability as well. Scanning electron microscopy
revealed remnants of fungi and bacteria, and the wood also had more holes in it
than modern counterparts. Besides allowing for permeability, the holes create more room for the varnish to seep
into the wood, which improves the vibrational qualities, depending on the composition of the varnish, of course.
The varnish itself was extremely important to the quality of
the violin. Analysis revealed that the varnish in one of the Stradivari
instruments was composed of calcite, quartz, feldspar, and gypsum. Garnet,
rutile, and argentite were also present, along with fifteen other minerals. The
hard varnish increases the acoustics of the walls of the instrument, and has the
potential to reduce noise emission, depending on what type of crystals are used.
In the end, there is still room for research on why the
Stradivari and Guarneri instruments are a cut above the rest. Like any other
piece of art, scientists very rarely touch musical instruments like these,
unless a nondestructive technique is used. It’s still a bit of a mystery, but
we do know a good instrument comes from stiff, permeable wood and a strong
varnish, as well as a little bit of chemistry.
Here's my dilemma. Were Stradivari and Guarneri geniuses who knew what they were putting on their instruments and why? Or did they just somehow luck into the circumstances of wood type and varnish that led to magnificent creations? Even with all of the chemical and physical evidence behind the instruments, people today still can't reproduce the amazing quality from these Italian artisans. And so, the mystery persists.
Stradivarius Violin |
Resources:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0004245
http://www.nagyvaryviolins.com/the_chemistry_of_a_stradivarius.pdf
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7119/full/444565a.html
No comments:
Post a Comment